Polework, SJ & confidence coaching at Askham Bryan College Leanne Heslop
Friday 06 February 2026
Entries close in 6 days
3 upcoming events
Next event:
01/02/2026 ARENA XC TECHNICAL CLINIC with Lucinda Atkinson
Find out more ..
Merchandise has become an increasingly visible part of how riding clubs and teams present themselves. It appears at shows, during travel, around yards, and in the spaces where riders, staff, and supporters gather away from the arena. Hoodies, sweatshirts, and T-shirts now function as quiet markers of belonging, signalling affiliation long before anyone steps into the saddle.
Despite that visibility, club merchandise often fails to live up to expectations. Clubs order garments with enthusiasm, and members wear them briefly before they fade into storage. Designs look confident in concept but feel awkward in everyday use. Reorders introduce inconsistency, delays, or a sense that the process demands more effort than it should.
These outcomes rarely reflect a lack of care or professionalism. Riding clubs operate within structured, detail-driven environments. The issues arise because clubs make merchandise decisions without a clear framework for what the clothing should represent, how people will wear it, and how it moves through a print production process.
Merchandise sits at a practical intersection. It touches identity, design, garment engineering, and production logistics. When clubs consider those elements together, results improve noticeably. When clubs handle them in isolation, compromises accumulate quickly.
The aim of this article is not to prescribe trends or promote products, but to clarify how effective riding club merchandise is built in practice, from early design thinking through to garment choice and artwork preparation, using principles grounded in real print workflows rather than theory.
Underperforming merchandise rarely results from a single poor decision. More often, it reflects a sequence of small compromises made under time pressure.
Merchandise planning frequently begins late. A show approaches, a season starts, or organisers schedule a photograph, and the need for branded clothing becomes urgent. What should be a considered process becomes compressed into a short window. Clubs address design, garment selection, and production simultaneously rather than sequentially, reducing the opportunity to make informed trade-offs.
Clubs often make visual decisions without understanding how designs behave once printed. Designers create logos for jackets, signage, or digital use, and clubs transfer them directly onto casual garments without adaptation. Colour choices that appear vibrant on screen lose clarity on fabric. Fine detail that reads well digitally disappears entirely once ink interacts with texture.
Expectations also play a role. Clubs often expect merchandise to satisfy multiple, sometimes conflicting goals. It should feel official yet casual, distinctive yet timeless, robust yet comfortable. Without a clear hierarchy of priorities, designs attempt to meet every requirement and end up feeling compromised.
Clubs frequently accept production issues as unavoidable. Teams treat inconsistent print quality, delays, or difficulty reordering as normal rather than as signals that earlier decisions need improvement. In reality, many of these problems originate before a printer ever receives artwork.
Merchandise underperformance reflects a workflow issue. When the purpose of the clothing remains unclear, every downstream decision becomes harder to resolve cleanly.
Presentation, tradition, and discipline shape how riders dress when mounted, and that formality remains inseparable from the identity of the sport itself. Clothing in this context is specialised, regulated, and closely tied to safety and tradition.
Alongside this sits a second, equally important category of clothing worn by yard staff, grooms, coaches, helpers, and event crews. These garments function as uniforms. Staff wear them as part of a role rather than a choice. Durability, clarity, and consistency matter more than expression. Branding in this context supports recognition and authority rather than personal affiliation.
Club merchandise exists in a third space. Members choose to wear hoodies, sweatshirts, and T-shirts voluntarily. They wear these garments before riding, after riding, while travelling, or simply away from the yard. Their role is to express belonging rather than to function or be formal.
Difficulties arise when clubs do not consciously separate these categories. Merchandise designs often inherit the visual language of formal riding attire or the logic of uniforms. Clubs apply crests designed for jackets or signage unchanged to casual garments. Placement decisions prioritise visibility over comfort or wearability.
The result can feel overly rigid. Clothing intended for relaxed, everyday use can feel more formal than garments explicitly designed for competition or work. Wearers may support the club wholeheartedly while quietly choosing not to wear the merchandise outside specific situations.
A clear distinction between formal identity, working identity, and merchandise strengthens rather than fragments a club’s image. Each category benefits from design decisions appropriate to its role. Merchandise, in particular, performs best when it reflects the informal, social contexts in which people actually wear it.
Longevity measures design effectiveness in merchandise, not initial impact. Clothing that looks striking on first impression but feels dated or awkward after a short period rarely achieves sustained use.
Many clubs approach design by asking how much information they can include. Logos expand, secondary marks appear, and colour palettes widen. While these choices may seem comprehensive, they often reduce clarity when the design transfers to fabric.
Simplicity functions as a practical design choice rather than an aesthetic trend. Limited colour palettes reproduce more consistently across different garments and print runs. Fewer elements reduce the risk of distortion, misalignment, or colour shift. Designs remain legible at a distance and in motion.
Scale and placement matter as much as the graphic itself. A crest that reads clearly on signage may overwhelm a chest print. Small details that work in close-up lose impact once viewed at arm’s length. Designing with real-world viewing conditions in mind significantly improves outcomes.
Colour selection benefits from restraint. Using club colours does not require using all of them simultaneously. Selecting one or two complementary tones often produces a more versatile garment than attempting to reproduce the full colour. Contrast matters more than saturation once ink meets fabric.
Designing for repeated wear also means planning for repeated washing. High-contrast, uncomplicated graphics maintain clarity longer than complex compositions. Merchandise that ages well continues to represent the club positively long after initial distribution.
Effective design starts by considering how people will use the garment—clothing intended for travel or casual settings benefits from subtlety. Asking whether someone would choose a design repeatedly, rather than whether it stands out momentarily, shifts the focus toward longevity.
Garment selection underpins every other merchandise decision. Treating it as a retail choice rather than a production decision introduces unnecessary risk.
Manufacturers engineer high-street garments for immediate comfort and visual appeal on racks. Fabric weights vary between batches. They optimise dye processes for retail colour rather than print compatibility. Construction tolerances differ widely. These variables become apparent once garments enter a print environment.
Specialist print workflows supply clothing designed with decoration in mind. Fabric stability, surface consistency, and predictable shrinkage support reliable printing. These characteristics reduce variation across sizes and batches, improving consistency both within an order and across reorders.
Sourcing garments and printing together also simplifies accountability. When issues arise, responsibility is clear. When clubs supply garments independently, diagnosing problems becomes more complex, particularly when inconsistencies appear across different runs.
For clubs producing printed club merchandise in the UK, working within established print supply chains helps ensure cleaner results and smoother repeat orders. Predictability becomes an advantage rather than a constraint, particularly as clubs grow or refresh merchandise over time.
Many UK riding clubs work with specialist print suppliers such as The T-Shirt Bakery, which provide garments engineered for decoration and manage printing and supply as a single workflow.
Sustainability considerations fit naturally within this discussion when framed practically. Durable garments that maintain shape, colour, and print quality over the years reduce waste by default. Clothing that remains wearable over the long term has a lower environmental footprint than items discarded after limited use, regardless of initial material claims.
Garment choice also influences design decisions. Heavier fabrics support bolder prints and structured shapes. Lighter garments may benefit from simpler graphics and restrained placement. Understanding this relationship early prevents compromise later.
Merchandise works best when garment selection supports the design intent rather than limits it.
Artwork preparation creates one of the most common sources of friction in merchandise production. The reasons are straightforward, but teams often underestimate them.
Print files operate under different constraints than digital graphics. Images that appear sharp on screen may lack sufficient resolution once scaled to print size. Artwork designed for web or social use frequently breaks down when transferred to fabric.
Print-ready artwork typically requires a resolution of 300 dpi at the final print size. Designers should provide files at the intended print dimensions rather than resizing them after submission. High-resolution PNG files with transparent backgrounds allow accurate placement and reduce the risk of unwanted artefacts.
Colour handling also requires consideration. Different direct-to-garment printers handle colour files differently: some work from RGB artwork and convert it during printing, while others prefer CMYK files, depending on their equipment and setup.
Shared expectations and early proofing help reduce the risk of surprises. Printers may adjust colours to achieve the closest possible match on fabric. Clear communication with your printer and realistic expectations support smoother production at this stage.
Designers with print experience can add significant value when internal expertise is limited. They adapt logos and layouts specifically for garments, reducing revision cycles and improving consistency. In many cases, involving a designer early saves time later.
Printers themselves often provide guidance on artwork setup. Asking questions early prevents avoidable delays. Treating artwork as a production asset rather than a one-off file supports consistency across reorders and future projects.
Planning beyond the first run also matters. Clubs that store final artwork files, document colour references, and record placement specifications find subsequent orders significantly easier to manage.
Clarity rather than complexity builds effective riding club merchandise. Strong outcomes come from understanding what the clothing is for, how people will wear it, and how it moves through production.
A clear separation between formal riding identity, working uniforms, and club merchandise allows each category to function correctly. Designs built for everyday wear outperform those borrowed directly from formal contexts. Garments selected for decoration reduce variability and frustration. Artwork prepared with print reality in mind streamlines production.
Merchandise succeeds when it feels considered rather than imposed. Clothing that people choose to wear repeatedly reinforces identity more effectively than garments worn only when required.
When viewed as a long-term asset rather than a last-minute task, club merchandise becomes easier to manage and more valuable to those who wear it.
0 entries £0.00